Integrated Patrol v. Traditional Policing Essay Essay Example

Integrated Patrol v. Traditional Policing Essay Essay 1. The 14-month consequences are impressive. What are the major factors for this success The protocol that Chief G is seeking to implement with his constabulary force is called intergrated patrol. How does this attack comparison to the traditional theoretical account of jurisprudence enforcement? The integrated patrol scheme brings a community-oriented construct of patroling into drama. which offense bar and decrease attempts are applied in larger countries. instead than concentrating specifically on a group of people within a peculiar location. The incorporate patrol scheme. besides calls for more enhanced fact-finding processs. It besides stresses the importance of information sharing between bureaus. This is proven to help in effectual solutions to work outing offenses and path tendencies and forms. As a consequence these stratigiesto strengthen relationships between bureaus. . We will write a custom essay sample on Integrated Patrol v. Traditional Policing Essay specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Integrated Patrol v. Traditional Policing Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Integrated Patrol v. Traditional Policing Essay specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer In comparision the traditional enforcement scheme responded to offense after the fact. and merely concentrated on a certain state of affairs or offense. The traditional scheme is missing when it comes to making more organized and strategic programs for the force excercising it. The strategic planning is critical in saying the overall constabulary mission. You might look at incorporate patrol as a one squad. one fight’ construct. While the traditional manner of making things. is every adult male for himself. point of position. Resistance in this state of affairs will most likely come from Sam. He has worked for the force for 26 old ages. He started as a round bull and has earned his manner to the place he presently holds. He believes in hionesty. equity. and seting in your clip toi earn your chevrons. Respect from Sam must be earned non given on first intrioduction automatically. Sing as how Sam has spent 26 old ages of his life working his manner to the place he holds now it is likely to presume that he wouldn’t appreciate person trade name new to the force being out into a place of any sort of his degree without first gaining it. So Sam will hold a natural opposition to allowing any other officers investigate becauser her believes once more that you have to gain the right to be an investigater. We can get the better of Sam’s personal struggles with the ideals we want to put Forth by reassuring him that he heads that section and the descision on who will be look intoing will still finally be his. Equally good as the fact he should be told this is a test and if it is non to work out so no injury no foul. The least resisitance in this scenario I believe will be coming from Peter. I believe he isn’t seeking to throw up any sort of opposition at all. His chief figure one end it seems to me is to hold an copacetic well organized and good runing force every bit good as. He is smart plenty to cognize that opposition against this thought from head would non alter the courser of action that the head would necessitate him to get down on but merely do struggle and possible demerrits for him. He welcomes this alteration and looks in front to get down the test with a positive and hopeful attitude that this new intergrated patrol will win with their force merely as it did with the experiment force they tested it with.

Meet Ulysses (Odysseus), the Hero Homers Odyssey

Meet Ulysses (Odysseus), the Hero Homers Odyssey Ulysses is the Latin form of the name Odysseus, the hero of Homers Greek epic poem The Odyssey. The Odyssey is one of the greatest works of classical literature and is one of two epic poems attributed to Homer. Its characters, images, and story arc are integrated into many more contemporary works; for example, James Joyces great modernist work Ulysses uses the structure of The Odyssey to create a unique and complex work of fiction. About Homer and The Odyssey The Odyssey was written in about 700 BCE and was intended to be recited or read aloud. To make this task easier, most characters and many objects are provided with epithets: short phrases uses to describe them each time they are mentioned. Examples include rosy-fingered dawn, and gray-eyed Athena. The Odyssey includes 24 books and 12,109 lines written in a poetic meter called dactylic hexameter. The poem was probably written in columns on parchment scrolls. It was first translated into English in 1616. Scholars are not in agreement as to whether Homer actually wrote or dictated the entire 24 books of The Odyssey. In fact, there is even some disagreement about whether Homer was a real historical man (though it is probable that he did exist). Some believe that Homers writings (including a second epic poem called The Iliad) were actually the work of a group of authors. The disagreement is so significant that the debate about Homers authorship has been given the name The Homeric Question. Whether or not he was the sole author, however, it seems likely that a Greek poet named Homer played a major role in its creation. The Story of The Odyssey The story of The Odyssey begins in the middle. Ulysses has been away for almost 20 years, and his son, Telemachus, is searching for him. In the course of the first four books, we learn that Odysseus is alive. In the second four books, we meet Ulysses himself. Then, in books 9-14, we hear of his exciting adventures during his odyssey or journey. Ulysses spends 10 years trying to get back home to Ithaca after the Greeks win the Trojan War.   On his way home, Ulysses and his men encounter various monsters, enchanters, and dangers. Ulysses is known for his cunning, which he uses when his men find themselves stuck in the cave of the Cyclops Polyphemus. However, Ulysses trick, which includes blinding Polyphemus, puts Ulysses on the bad side of the Cyclops father, Poseidon (or Neptune in the Latin version). In the second half of the story, the hero has reached his home in Ithaca. Upon arriving, he learns that his wife, Penelope, has turned away more than 100 suitors. He plots and takes revenge on the suitors who have been wooing his wife and eating his family out of hearth and home.

Ludwig Von Beethoven and his Ninth Symphony Essay

Ludwig Von Beethoven and his Ninth Symphony - Essay Example Despite these abhorrent forms of child abuse, Beethoven developed a sensitivity and vision for music. In 1789, after his mother’s death, Beethoven was forced to into manhood. He went determined, to his fathers employer and demanded - and got – half of his fathers salary so that he could take care of his brothers and one year old sister. In 1792 his father, much to Beethoven’s relief died. In 1801 Beethoven confessed to his friends at Bonn his worry of becoming deaf. In 1802, he wrote a famous text which expressed his distress at his perceived unfairness of his life. He could not reconcile himself with the idea of a loving music and that his most important sense, his hearing, was dissipating. Desolate, he did not want to live through the process of becoming deaf. Beethovens career as a virtuoso pianist was brought to an end when he began to experience his first symptoms of deafness. In a letter written to his friend Karl Ameda on 1 July 1801, he admitted he was e xperiencing signs of deafness. It is perhaps this resolute refusal to cave in to his deafness that allowed him to continue his marvelous works. Indeed, it can be said that Beethoven continued in his compositions in spite of his deafness. In 1802 his doctor sent him to Heiligenstadt, a village outside Vienna, in the hope that its rural peace would rest in his hearing. The new surroundings reawakened in Beethoven a love of nature and the countryside, and hope and optimism returned. By autumn however, Beethoven felt so low both physically and mentally that he feared he would not survive the winter.

Cataract (right) removal and intraocular lens implant Essay

Cataract (right) removal and intraocular lens implant - Essay Example The patient may need brighter light to read or may go in for frequent changes in glasses. In advanced stages there may be double vision in a single eye. Cataract does not cause pain. Only a hyper mature cataract may cause pain, redness and inflammation and this is rare. Cataract affects lens in the eyes which is located just behind the iris and the pupil. It may or may not affect the entire lens. The lens consists of three layers. The outer layer which is the capsule is a thin, clear membrane. It surrounds a soft, clear material called cortex. The hard center of the lens is the nucleus. A cataract can form in any part of the lens. In most cases, cataract develops in both the eyes. However, cataract occurring as a consequence of injury or trauma can occur in single eyes. In normal eyes, the lens focuses light, producing clear, sharp images on the retina. Due to cataract, the lens becomes clouded, which scatters the light and prevents a sharply defined image from reaching your retina, causing blurred vision. Nuclear cataract: This type of cataract occurs in the nucleus of the lens. There may be a temporary improvement in the reading vision in the initial stages due to the way it focuses light. However, as the lens gets clouded, vision gradually diminishes. Dim light vision and driving at night may be especially troublesome. Advanced discoloration can lead to difficulty distinguishing between shades of blue and purple. Cortical cataract: This type of cataract occurs in the cortex and begins as whitish, wedge-shaped opacities or streaks on the outer edge of the lens cortex and gradually encroach the centre. Both the distance and near vision can be impaired. Focusing and glare problems along with distortion and loss of contrast are also common. Subcapsular cataract: A subcapsular cataract starts as a small, opaque area just under the capsule of the

Writing Deficiencies Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Writing Deficiencies - Article Example The researchers assert that teachers in classroom can help students develop better writing skills through the method of modified sentence combining technique. In this technique errors figured out in specific sentences are informed to the students and then the teachers provide information regarding how these errors can be eliminated and reduced. Researchers even assert that if teachers start giving importance to sentences while grading students, sentence structuring will become better as students will learn about the errors they have made. Researchers even assert that teachers have to act as grammar police and the only way students can learn how to write in an appropriate manner is if teachers help students correct their grammatical errors and sentence formation errors at school and formal education level. The researchers believe that if students are not helped in solving the issue of writing deficiency, they may add up to the cost of organizations they work for as they may poist a ne gative image of the organization and their productivity levels will decline if they have to reread any business related

A Critical Analysis Of The Oslo Peace Accord Politics Essay

A Critical Analysis Of The Oslo Peace Accord Politics Essay Account for the success and the failure of the Oslo peace accord. This essay will discuss the ongoing attempts of getting a peace agreement between the Palestinians and Israel. The essay will also examine the 1993 Oslo Accords that started the peace process. It will also highlight a brief history of the two nations involved, that brought about the signing the historic Oslo Accords. Also, get some finding after the signing, whether it has encountered any obstacles on its way, and finally made an account of it success and failure. The Palestinians did not feel comfortable, after the Six Day War in 1967, they had planned to crush Israel with the help other armies from Jordan, Egypt, etc. The plan did not work and only did the Palestinians loss the war but it was more than a war. The West Bank and Gaza Strip was now under control of Israel. The creation of the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) came in earlier years, under the leadership of Yasir Arafat their motive was political and a paramilitary organisation of Palestinian Arabs. It dedicated to establishing independent for the Palestinians state, around the Jordan River and the Mediterranean Sea and by so doing, their intention was to replace Israel. Some groups within the organisation have not been in agreement with the redefinition of it mandate not to conquer only the Gaza Strip and West Bank but also Israel. Nevertheless, despite the numerous changes in government that has taken place in the 1980s and the 1990s in Israel, all with different political agenda and ideologies, they all seen to be sinking for peace for national development. However, The Labor government elected in July 1992 froze new construction in the West Bank including many of the units that Sharons office had in the pipeline. The Likud government that returned to power in 1996 thawed freeze, but with the comeback to power of Labor in June 1999 and the resumption of the peace talk with the Palestinians, construction for Israelis in the West Bank was no longer a government priority. (Alterman, 2002). In 1992 when the Israels election campaign was at its pick, Terje Larsen, a Norwegian sociologist and the head of an Oslo-based institute of Applied Social Sciences, known as FAFO in Norwegian acronym, Terje was also the main architects of the Oslo agreement. Larsen met with Yossi Beilin who was a member of the opposition Labor in the Israeli Knesset. Both men met and voiced out their doubt if whether the progress could be made in Washington talks on peace between the Israel and Palestinians from the West Bank and Gaza. (BEILIN, 1999). Beilin was to belief Larsen about the having direct talks between the PLO and Israel will be necessary for any peace, therefore suggested that he talk to Yair Hirschfeld, a senior lecturer on Middle East affairs at university of Haifa. Hirschfeld had express interest in the economic and social-political aspect of the conflict that Larsen was exploring. Larsen on the other was of the believed that, there was the need for the Israeli has to talk to the PLO. However, Israel law banned contact with the PLO officials. Nevertheless, due to the ban, there was the need to fine another means and therefore Larsen suggested a creation of backchannel all the parties involve, including Faisal Husseini of East Jerusalem a prominent member of the PLO. However Husseini was involve in the Washington negotiations because the Prime Minister Yitzhak Shamir due to him been a resident of East Jerusalem and his participation will amount to any Israeli concession in the near future of the status of Israels capital. After all the negotiations, limitation and the discussion the 13 September 1993-the day the Declaration of Palestinians (DOP), was sign at the South Lawn of the White House with the US President Bill Clinton as the master of the ceremony, hosting the representatives of the states of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organisation(PLO). The signing sealed with a historic handshake between the Israeli and Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin and the Palestinian Liberation Organisation (PLO) chairman Yasir Arafat, it became one of the momentous events of the twentieth-century history of the Middle East. The two leaders redrew a geopolitical map of the whole region. Although the DOP was signed in Washington under the direction of the UN president, all the background woks, negotiation has been in Oslo and initialled the Oslo Accord in late August. Therefore, a more propitiate name than naming it the Washington Accord. The accord itself was in two parts, the first was a mutual recognition betwe en the Israel and the PLO, and it took a form of simple letters, on plain paper with no letterheads, dated on the 9 and 10 September sign by the two leaders. The second part was the Declaration of Principles on the Interim Self-Government Arrangements, in the occupied territories. The Oslo Accord was not a peace deal but a peace process. Under the DOP arrangement there were set of agreement that both parties needed to for fill in the order to come to a peace accord, (Shlaim, 1994). The demands (Palestinians) Independent Palestinians states, states the Palestinians can call their own, Palestinians also wanted lands Israel took in the 6 days war. The Palestinians also wanted Jerusalem as the capital. Return of Palestinians Refugees and the removal of all Jewish Settlements. The Palestinians demands were threat to Israel but there was need for Israel to accept them. However, before all this demand to meet there needed to be true scenes of trust between the two leaders and the Oslo Accord was design for that. Israel commitments: Israeli agreed to accept the PLO not as a terrorist organisation but as legal body under the new name of Palestinian Authority (P.A), it also was ready to transfer lands to the PA. Israelis were committed to educating its people for peace and prepares them for the Palestinians next door. The creation of a P.A. police force of up 10,000, with no provision for terrorist and the Israelis were to supply arms to the P.A. to police their own people and to destroy terror. (Makovssky, 1996). For peace to become successful, the P.L.O was to give some commitment too, and some of the commitments made were: To end all kind of terror activities, they also agreed to recognise Israels right to exist by amending the P.L.O national charter, which call for the destruction of all of Israel. The P.A. made a commitment to destroy all terror groups and size all weapons and to protect all Jewish Holy sites that falls under the PA control, all feature negotiation will be by diplomacy and never again, to go back to terror and it final commitment was to educate for peace. However, Israels commitment to Oslo was so great that it began to talk peace all over, in all levels in schools and it was ready to deal with anyone who will disagree to perching peace. Despite all the effort for peace not all Israelis were convinced, and there were shock when terror came in 1995 when Jewish militant assassinated Yitzhak Rabin. Nevertheless, the success of the Israeli support for peace education was seen as 28% were in support of creating a Palestinians states before Oslo because of security threat, and in the years following Oslo, it went up 51%. Israel had met part of its commitment in Oslo agreement. However, there were still acts of terror from the side of the Palestinians and more than the years before Oslo. The P.A. did not violate it main commitment of ending terror, but all of the commitment made at the signing since the terror groups like Hamas were still operate under the watchful eyes of the P.A. The Holy Site was not protected by the Palestinians received land but Israel did not receive peace. There are no clear words of success to the Oslo Accord, only that Israel was committed to the accord by complying with its parts of the commitment made, moreover, on the other hand of the accord the Palestinians were probably not ready for peace and so did not comply with the commitment it made. However, there are more to say on its failure than one can image, according to Pundak in a 2001 publication by the Institute of Strategic Studies. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ Netanyahu sabotaged the peace process relentlessly, and made every effort to de-legitimise his Palestinian partners. His main weapon in his campaign against the Palestinians was the mantra that the Palestinians were not fulfilling its part of the agreements; and therefore Israel would not implement its part. In truth, during Netanyahus government, both sides committed breaches with regard to the agreement à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ ¦ But the Israeli breaches were more numerous and more substantive in nature. The goals between the two states involve were incompatible with each other existence as few people to lived in peace. A peace agreement out of the balance meant failure was investable.

Contrasting the Court of Miracles and Notre-Dame Essay -- comparison c

Contrasting the Court of Miracles and Notre-Dame "No one had yet remarked, in the gallery of royal statues..., a strange looking specter who until then had been observing all that passed... All at once, at the moment that the chief executer's two assistants were preparing to execute,... he strided up to the two sub-executioners, knocked them down, carried off the gipsy girl, and leapt at one bound into the church, lifting the girl above his head and cried out in a formidable voice, 'Sanctuary!'" Notre-Dame, an intimidating edifice in the heart of fifteenth century Paris, bears many different faces for those residing in and near it. Quasimodo, the deformed bell ringer dwells in the church after being adopted by the archdeacon, Claude Frollo, when the hunchback was an infant. The empathetic monster lives in complete servitude to Frollo, his savior, and spends his days ringing his beloved bells which repay his altruism by causing him to go deaf. The highly adept archdeacon, Claude Frollo, also resides within the walls of Notre-Dame, and after filling his head with every piece of knowledge he can find, he begins to dedicate his life to alchemy. The two men, besides their relationship and common habitat, have one other item in common. They both have fallen in love with La Esmeralda, a compassionate, orphaned gipsy girl who earns her living on the streets with her fluid dancing and droll tricks her goat, and best friend, Djali performs. Quasimodo's love is pure and fresh and he lives in awe of La Esmeralda after she offers him a drink of water when the townspeople deny him this request while he is being tortured as punishment for the sole crime of being deaf and not understanding the judge. Frollo's... ...ts walls are not as strong as the building. The archdeacon, Claude Frollo, a holy man, gives way to the sin of the flesh and tries to rape as well as kill La Esmeralda. Phoebus, a man who worships God within it's walls, single-handedly could save La Esmeralda's life, but chooses not to because of his own vanity. The entire town closes its eyes to the truth, and condemns an innocent girl to death without any proof, just for the fact that she is different from them. The structures of the Court of Miracles and the Cathedral of Notre-Dame are very different structures. Notre-Dame is a symbol of strength and God while the Court of Miracles represents the filth of the Earth. Yet, as Hugo's theme suggests, one cannot judge places, or men, by their appearances and the Court of Miracles proves to be the stronghold, while Notre-Dame houses the iniquity of the city.